On Thu 06 Jun 2013 at 08:59:19 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
Several minor points:
> +<P>The default IPP version is 2.0 but can be overriden by adding a slash
> followed by <CODE>/version=</CODE> and the desired IPP version (can be 1.0 or
> 1.1).</P>
Is '. . by adding a slash followed . . . ' needed if <CODE></CODE>
contains '/version='?
> + From Cups 1.6, the default IPP version for requests is now 2.0. For
> + remote connections such as configured with an explicit ServerName in
> + /etc/cups/cups-client.conf, an older IPP version such as 1.1 or even
> + 1.0 might need to be explicitely set for printing to keep working, for
> + example:
> +
> + ServerName remote-print-server.example.com/version=1.1
> +
> + -- Didier Raboud <o...@debian.org> Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:05:57 +0200
From cups 1.6 the default IPP version for requests is 2.0. For
remote connections configured with ServerName in
/etc/cups/cups-client.conf, an older IPP version such as 1.1 or even
1.0 might need to be explicitly set for printing to keep working. For
example:
1. 'cups' or 'CUPS', surely?
2. A comma isn't needed after '1.6'.
3. I'd remove what may be seen as some redundant words and phrases.
4. 'explicitely' should be 'explicitly'.
5. A full stop or semi-colon is better after 'working'.
Regards,
Brian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130606113609.GA16863@desktop
