On 2013-06-06 08:59:19 +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Vincent: I'm hereby merging both 704238 and 711192 as the latter is > and occurence of the first. Also, thanks for testing the four > possibilities, it confirms Daniel's documentation below.
I've also tested that the following worked: ServerName lip-printserver1.lip.ens-lyon.fr:631/version=1.1 > Maintainer script prompt for a remote server incompatibility is > probably overkill (and we usually try very hard to avoid these > prompts), but I propose the attached patch which mentions this > /version= possibility in two places upstream: man client.conf and > doc/help/ref-client-conf.html. There's a small mistake: +<P>The default IPP version is 2.0 but can be overriden by adding a slash followed by <CODE>/version=</CODE> and the desired IPP version (can be 1.0 or 1.1).</P> You should say either "by adding <CODE>/version=</CODE> and the desired IPP version [...]" or "by adding a slash followed by <CODE>version=</CODE> and the desired IPP version [...]", otherwise there would be 2 slashes. and in cups-client.NEWS, replace "explicitely" by "explicitly". > On the Debian packaging side, I propose to add a cups-client NEWS > entry (which one is _really_ supposed to read across upgrades), and > amend the client.conf example file shipped in the source as > debian/client.conf (which I'm not sure is installed or used > anywhere, but that at least makes the source consistent). > > Opinions ? Agreed, though detecting the IPP version would be much better (isn't the negotiation part of the protocol?). -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-printing-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130606111533.ga15...@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr
