Hi, (haven't seen the original mail, so replying to this one)
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 01:40:20PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 12:51:29PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 07:01:00PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > >>Alexander Wirt dixit: > >> > >>>Could you please (technically) summarize what needs to be done from > >>>listmaster side? > >> > >>1. Remove whatever debian-po...@lists.debian.org is right now > >> > >>2. Create a new debian-po...@lists.debian.org mailing list which > >> works just like the other regular lists > >> > >>3. Announce the new debian-po...@lists.debian.org so that people > >> can subscribe to it; document that there is no longer > >> an address to reach *all* ports but that people should > >> eMail the individual ports’ lists (and cross-post if > >> needed, but only to the amount needed), and that the > >> new debian-po...@lists.debian.org instead is a mailing list for > >> discussion about > >> a) debian-ports.org infrastructure > >> b) porting Debian in general > >> c) questions related to setting up a Debian port, > >> including wanna-build, buildd, etc. That seems like a bad idea to me, tbh. There will be people who won't notice that the meaning of debian-ports@ has changed, and who will try to use it with its old meaning. If there are problems with the current meaning of debian-ports, can't we just retire the old alias and create a list under a different name? -- It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate and beer -- Barack Obama, speaking in Brussels, Belgium, 2014-03-26 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150722153817.gb9...@grep.be
