On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:39:10PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >Hi folks, > >I believe the existing debian-ports setup (as an exploder pointing to >all the different port lists) is not working well at all. It's a >confusing setup to many people, which leads to lots of cross-list >noise that's probably not warranted. Some of the traffic is also >clearly meant to be discussing the debian-ports setup itself rather >than individual ports, and that's also off-topic for those ports that >are in the main archive. So, I propose: > > * Remove the confusion: turn debian-ports into a separate *normal* > mailing list, announce it and let people subscribe to it as they > see fit normally. This would be specifically for "discussions about > ports.debian.org and architectures hosted there". > > * Explicitly do *not* add another exploder to replace the old > address: instead, *if* we want something to cover this use case, > add a new list that interested people can subscribe to. Maybe > "debian-cross-ports" or "debian-architectures" or something. Please > feel free to suggest a better name! If such a list were to be set > up, we could/should encourage existing architecture porters to sign > up there too. > >Thoughts?
Any dissenting opinions? Listmasters - are you happy to change things like I propose? -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. st...@einval.com Armed with "Valor": "Centurion" represents quality of Discipline, Honor, Integrity and Loyalty. Now you don't have to be a Caesar to concord the digital world while feeling safe and proud. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powerpc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140910150520.go24...@einval.com
