On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 12:39:00PM +0200, Jens Schmalzing wrote: > Hi, > > Sven Luther writes: > > > I am searching for testers for the new 2.4.22-2 serie of kernel > > packages before uploading them to the archive, and potentially > > breaking lot of stuff. > > Well, the kernel booted fine on all the Newworld Powermacs that I > could get a hand on, which is probably not surprising - they are all a > bit old and hence reasonably well-supported. Want a list of models?
Ok, nice. Did it work fine with the kernel modules also ? It seems that on oldworld, it was searching for /lib/modules/2.4.22-powerpc modules, while the modules where in -powerpc-pmac. But then, maybe he was using an older kernel or something such. You had not the same problem, did you not ? > > Remaining problems : > > > > 1) Each kernel image still has a 8Mo or such copy of the > > modules. I wanted to separate them, but Manoj tells me this is not > > possible so near the sarge release, since it requires > > modifications of kernel-package, so it will be for later. > > Building a common modules package for all sub-archs sounds like a very > good thing to do. Just to get this right: You are probably aware that > in order to achieve this now, you could simply bypass make-kpkg in > debian/rules, like by doing one full build with make-kpkg and then > several kernel-only builds with make or somesuch. So are you saying > that you would like to wait till this functionality is integrated into > kernel-package? Yep, i could be doing it manually all the way. But i don't feel this is a good idea this near to sarge, and with 3 hours per build (down from around 4 previously though) mistakes are expensive. Once we have something working, and if there is time for it, i can always look into that. That said, my idea would be to simply postprocess the .deb creation phase, removing the modules from the packages or something such. Friendly, Sven Luther