got thatOn Aug Tue 26 2003 21:47, Jean-Christophe Michel wrote: > Hi, > > I'm on a Pismo 500 laptop on unstable. > I cannot use sound, i have no module alsa. > grep ALSA /usr/src/benh_kernel/.config shows nothing. Mmmm... AFAIK ALSA only comes into the 2.6 kernels, doesn't it? SO don't expect to find anything about ALSA in the kernel config... Till then, I guess you will have to stick with the ALSA modules. You get the source code with apt-get install alsa-source and a tar.gz should appear in /usr/src/. Now, if you uncompress that tarball, it will expand a folder in /usr/src/modules. After you have configured your kernel with CONFIG_SOUND=y and no other option for drivers (you will use the alsa modules, no need for the dmasound thingie in the kernel), you compile it with a
I complied mine with this and it worked just fine for a long time. But I am using Ben H. 2.4.22 kernel enhancements.make-kpkg --revision host.version kernel-image
$ make-kpkg --append-to-version .asterix1 -rev Custom.1 kernel_image
worked..
After that, you run a make-kpkg modules-image
Now when I do this I get
$ make-kpkg modules_image
The changelog says we are creating 2.4.22-ben2.asterix1, but I thought the version is 2.4.22-ben2
make: *** [modules_image] Error 1
OR
$ make-kpkg modules-image
The changelog says we are creating 2.4.22-ben2.asterix1, but I thought the version is 2.4.22-ben2
make: *** [modules-image] Error 1
Then I tried.
$ make-kpkg --append-to-version .asterix1 -rev Custom.1 modules_image
Warning: The file include/linux/version.h exists
The contained UTS_VERSION string:
"2.4.22-ben2.asterix1"
does not match expectations:
"2.4.22.asterix1"
Please run:
% make-kpkg clean
% make-kpkg ... --append_to_version .asterix1 kernel_image [modules_image]
And...
$ make-kpkg --append-to-version -ben2.asterix1 -rev Custom.1 modules_image
The changelog says we are creating 2.4.22-ben2.asterix1, but I thought the version is 2.4.22-ben2-ben2.asterix1
make: *** [modules_image] Error 1
Each of these I can run make-kpkg modules-image
I did this before but without any make-kpkg --append-to-version [or] -rev and just had the raw unpacked kernel name without any appends.
This has been my first time to use the make-kpkg modules_image function.
Any sujestions?
-Adam