On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 12:50:08PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > > i just downloaded the vim source package, and will try building it. I suppose > the binutrils package in experimental is : > > binutils_2.9.5.0.10-0.1_powerpc.deb, somewhat older than the current binutils. > Will apt not complain about this and try to upload the package everytime i run > it ? Is the vim bug a binutils bug also ?
I beg your pardon? That's the newest binutils available, except for the unpackaged .11 (through .13 now?). > > > > Also i noticed there are lots of links from binary-powerpc to > > > slink/binary-all instead of to potato/binary-all. Is this correct > > > behavior, or should i fill bugs against the ftp repository ? (one > > > example was (yesterday) text/sgmlpm or something such, it is the perl > > > bindings to sgml.) > > > > Report a bug for this. > > Will do it, but first check if it was not solved yet. > > Friendly, > > Sven LUTHER > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dan /--------------------------------\ /--------------------------------\ | Daniel Jacobowitz |__| SCS Class of 2002 | | Debian GNU/Linux Developer __ Carnegie Mellon University | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | \--------------------------------/ \--------------------------------/
