On Wed, Sep 15, 1999 at 12:44:24PM +0200, Hartmut Koptein wrote: > > Should i upload the X package i will build, or will the autobuilder > > take care of it ? > > Upload it.
Ok, i will do it. What is the problem with the mach64 stuff ? any relation with the sparc mach64 stuff recently added to the package ? > > Also i noticed the following bug too : > > > > bahs$ vim > > BUG IN DYNAMIC LINKER ld.so: dl-runtime.c: 67: fixup: Assertion > > `((reloc->r_info) & 0xff) == 21' failed! > > > > Is it the same bug, or should vim be recompiled ? > > Same bug for what? The elf32ppclinux bug? Then no, this is another bug. > Wait some days and if it isn't available recompile it. i just downloaded the vim source package, and will try building it. I suppose the binutrils package in experimental is : binutils_2.9.5.0.10-0.1_powerpc.deb, somewhat older than the current binutils. Will apt not complain about this and try to upload the package everytime i run it ? Is the vim bug a binutils bug also ? > > Also i noticed there are lots of links from binary-powerpc to > > slink/binary-all instead of to potato/binary-all. Is this correct > > behavior, or should i fill bugs against the ftp repository ? (one > > example was (yesterday) text/sgmlpm or something such, it is the perl > > bindings to sgml.) > > Report a bug for this. Will do it, but first check if it was not solved yet. Friendly, Sven LUTHER
