Hello, On Thu 03 Oct 2019 at 10:40AM +02, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 08:03:15AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: >> > Like you document in the checklist addition to the virtual packages: >> > also those don't require any change to existing packages, it's just >> > there for everybody to know that starting from that version they can >> > make use of that new thing. Just to note that the case of virtual packages is a bit different, since you sometimes have to wait for Policy to be able to use it, but for most everything else, you can use it before Policy is updated. >> From your point of view, if we started to add a summary of >> d/changelog entries which are /not/ accounted for by the upgrading >> checklist to the d-d-a e-mail, would that be sufficient? Or do you >> think this stuff has to be in the upgrading checklist? > > I only read the title of the d-d-a mail, but I read the upgrade > checklist many times over the course of the years. Hope that answers > your question :) > > I think this would be the case where a 3rd party thought would be > welcome :) Yes, certainly, I'm happy to add it, and have now done so. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
