On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 04:21:11PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 07:14:08AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Hmm, this was deliberate because the additional documentation doesn't > > require anyone to make changes to their packages. > > > > Could you explain why you want it in the upgrading checklist? > > because it's a new thing, and it helps those people that don't follow > closely enough to know that there is a new thing. So if at some point > any given package start to need some "reboot required" information, > everybody who read once the checklist know that there already is a > policy/standard for that.
This is confusing. On one hand, packages are not supposed to require reboot, and /run/reboot-required is not honoured. On the other hand some packages require "reboot required" information from other ? Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
