Hi, > Can I recommend we keep the alternative available (with a somewhat lower > precedence, as retirment through nm.d.o are a tad easier to process for > everybody involved).
Wouldn't it be more advisable to write something like "in case you fail to authenticate to the NM site or have other issues to open the retirement/return process yourself, contact front desk" instead of keeping the former more cumbersome way of retirement alife? That also would adress "not advertise NM as the SSO support team". > This is still true. Nobody is actually checking the aliases to see if > any need updating in the retirement/removal process, so really if > somebody is receiving mails from an alias it needs to be updated > manually. Ok. Also, what about the gpg key? Are people asked to prove they still control their key? If so, in which way?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
