On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:59:40AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 04 Aug 2017, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>...
> > Uploaders is not the only option for doing that, but any change should
> > include provising more reliable information - not less reliable
> > information.
>
> In practice, Uploaders often only includes people who have ever uploaded
> the package, not everyone who is on (or still on) the team. I you'll
> have better luck with a who-uploads equivalent.
In practice, Uploaders often includes active team members who work
in git, but one specific team member does all the uploads.
I already gave the lintian package as an example for that.
And in the other direction what you describe would leave no way for
a person to make it visible that he has left the team.
> > An O: bug means that it is confirmed that the package is orphaned, and
> > gives permission to everyone to adopt the package immediately.
>
> So just file an an Intent-To-Orphan bug. [This why I suggested to file
> the bug against the package, and not against wnpp.]
>...
There is no Intent-To-Orphan bug.
And whenever possible the process should work by first confirming
that a person or team is MIA, and then orphan everything that was
maintained by that person or team.
In a more general note, I am a bit puzzled that it is so controversial
that machine-readable team membership information is important and
should continue to be available.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
