Russ Allbery dixit: >> The dietlibc licence does require for libgcc to be added there >> (GPL without exception clause). > >I think you mean that dietlibc requires that *dietlibc* be added, right?
No, I meant it like that. >If not, I'm confused. I don't see any reason why dietlibc's license would >change something about libgcc's license. dietlibc is GPL, so a derivate is also GPL. The mksh-static and lksh binaries, when linked against dietlibc, consist of dietlibc, libgcc and mksh derived source code, but the final binary is the work whose exact sources must be available. bye, //mirabilos -- «MyISAM tables -will- get corrupted eventually. This is a fact of life. » “mysql is about as much database as ms access” – “MSSQL at least descends from a database” “it's a rebranded SyBase” “MySQL however was born from a flatfile and went downhill from there” – “at least jetDB doesn’t claim to be a database” -- Tonnerre, psychoschlumpf and myself in #nosec -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1305231604380.2...@herc.mirbsd.org
