* Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org>, 2013-05-23, 01:04:
The dietlibc licence does require for libgcc to be added there (GPL
without exception clause).
I think you mean that dietlibc requires that *dietlibc* be added,
right?
If not, I'm confused. I don't see any reason why dietlibc's license
would change something about libgcc's license.
It's a viral license, so it infects libgcc.
GPLv2+ and GPLv3+-with-runtime-lib-exception = GPLv3+
It could be worse, of course:
GPLv2-only and GPLv3+-with-runtime-lib-exception = undistributable
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130523094759.ga9...@jwilk.net
