Raphael Hertzog <hert...@debian.org> (25/08/2009): > > 1) That's not ready yet. > > That's not true. It's not deployed on ftp-master […]
My point exactly: I can't upload such a package *right now*. Therefore, I call that “not ready yet”. > > > 3) If a package is lacking debian/README.source, then one should > > > expect that the source is ready to be used. If it not the case, even > > > an empty debian/README.source is better than none. > > > > 3) That's called noise. > > I can certainly understand the point of view of Bill. It's not noise > if you assume that you should not need to do anything before being > able to work on the package... and if you do, you should find the > required hint in README.source. The existence of the file (even if > empty) proves that the package uses some patch system and that he > should investigate a bit more. The existence of a debian/patches directory proves that the package uses some patch system and that he should investigate more. Mraw, KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
