On Mon, Jul 13 2009, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Andrew McMillan <and...@morphoss.com> writes:
>
>> It seems a sufficient quantity of people object to even the merest
>> mention of 'kibibytes' as shorthand for 'bytes divided by 1024 and
>> rounded' that only the fully expanded wording will be acceptable.
>>
>> The wording without it is unambiguous:
>>
>> The disk space is given as the integer value of the
>> installed size in bytes divided by 1024 and rounded.
>>
>> I guess that perhaps the '-ibibytes' standard will eventually die, and
>> everything will just become multiples of 1000, as it should be. In
>> the meantime, regardless of the success of failure of the standard,
>> this wording is at least correct for the current behaviour.
>
> Okay. I don't care enough about it to argue it, so I think the most
> productive thing to do is just drop the parenthetical. I can make that
> change.
+1
>> My preferred wording would be to define it in terms of kibibytes, but
>> include the explanation, since it seems it is an unfamiliar standard,
>> as follows:
>>
>> The disk space is given as the integer value of the
>> installed size in kibibytes (i.e. bytes divided by
>> 1024).
>
> Likewise. But I suspect that's going to be equally controversial.
Yes.
manoj
--
...when fits of creativity run strong, more than one programmer or
writer has been known to abandon the desktop for the more spacious
floor.- Fred Brooks, Jr.
Manoj Srivastava <sriva...@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
