Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> writes: > Sure, we could punt it to Alice to download the source code and hunt > around herself, essentially repeating the effort done by the package > maintainer. But since the package maintainer has already gone to that > effort, I think it's incumbent upon them to present that information to > Alice in a single, predictable location for that work, to make it easier > for her to know her rights in the work.
I wish that you'd not make this argument, since it strikes me as a non sequitur and I keep stumbling over it. Just because the Debian developer has done something does not place upon them an obligation to document that work for other people unless there's some compelling reason why we should *also* require the documentation. To me, this reads like saying "every Debian maintainer should have installed the package on a local test system before upload, so it's incumbent upon them to include the typescript of that installation in the package in case some user would find that useful." The second part just doesn't follow from the first. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
