Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> writes:
> I think we're getting bogged down in the debian/copyright
> discussion, and I'm starting to think that some enumeration of what
> we need debian/copyright for would help us figure out what it should
> actually contain.
Thank you for this.
> 6) Documentation for users about usability of packages in non-free
> (IE, non-commercial, non-modifiable, etc.)
Why restrict this point to non-free? I think it's important for users
of *all* software to have easy, predictably-located access to the
terms under which they receive it.
6) Documentation for users about all terms for works distributed
in Debian.
Unless you're trying to draw an IMO non-existent line between someone
who would never need to exercise the terms of the work, and different
people who would.
> If I've missed anything, please tack it in here.
--
\ “You can be a victor without having victims.” —Harriet Woods |
`\ |
_o__) |
Ben Finney
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
