Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> writes: > Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> writes: > > Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> writes: > > >> 6) Documentation for users about usability of packages in non-free > >> (IE, non-commercial, non-modifiable, etc.) > > > Why restrict this point to non-free? I think it's important for users of > > *all* software to have easy, predictably-located access to the terms > > under which they receive it. > > > > 6) Documentation for users about all terms for works distributed > > in Debian. > > I read this part as encapsulating the current Policy requirement > that packages in contrib and non-free use debian/copyright to > document why they're not in main.
Okay. If Don thinks my requirement above (which possibly needs to have s/in Debian/using Debian infrastructure/ applied, or similar) is a distinct requirement from what prompted me to write it, that's fine. I present it as a requirement regardless. -- \ “I spent a lot of money on wine and women, and like a fool I | `\ squandered the rest.” —Benny Hill | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-policy-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
