On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:26:52PM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Ok. I think we are actually all in agreement now, Can someone please > volunteer to go through the list of virtual packages and document > them properly? For each virtual package we should document
After a first skim-through the list, I find myself a little perplexed -- "editor" is not an official, policy-blessed virtual package name, but "lambdamoo-core" is. I think it's safe to say that something's wrong with this picture. (And it's just the tip of the iceburg, of course.) -- Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra- osis is too long [EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico- to fit into a single or [EMAIL PROTECTED] | volcaniconi- standalone haiku -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
