Previously Moshe Zadka wrote: > www-browser: definitely, here a standard interface (give a URL on the command > line) is useful. currently, urlview depends on an ugly hack > to do that (listing browsers itself)
doc-central does the same thing. > mail-reader: honestly, I fail to see a reason why this is sane. > "less /var/mail/moshez" is as good a mail reader as any. > what on earth would prompt someone to suggest a mail-reader > is truly beyond me. Mail notification programs what start a MUA when you click on them for example. > Should a mail-reader also be able to *send* mail? That would actually > make it a useful virtual package, again with a minimum of interface > (accept an address on the command line, e.g.) The name mail-reader suggests it doesn't. Perhapt it would be useful to introduce mail-user-agent, which is both a common name, unlike mail-reader, and has a proper definition: mail user agent <messaging> (MUA) The program that allows the user to compose and read {electronic mail} messages. The MUA provides the interface between the user and the {Message Transfer Agent}. Outgoing mail is eventually handed over to an MTA for delivery while the incoming messages are picked up from where the MTA left it (although MUA's running on single-user machines may pick up mail using {POP}). > Better: adding interfaces for those virtual packages which lack an interface, > and supplying patches to support those interfaces, and throwing > those which truly serve no purpose. Definitely. Wichert. -- _________________________________________________________________ /[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.wiggy.net/ | | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]