Anthony Towns wrote: > Your message was > From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ...?
Hmm. > On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:02:17AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Do you mean accessing docs programatically (rare) or by reference in man > > pages and error messages (sorta common)? > > Programmatically, mainly. Well then I don't have any real objections. Aside from the web servers, and possibly document indexing systems like dhelp and so on, I suppose the number of programs that hard code /usr/doc is pretty rare. And a sizable chunk of them are programs that only access their _own_ docs in /usr/doc, and it doesn't matter if we miss or don't get to such programs, because it won't cause any upgrade problems if they are only fixed later. So full steam ahead.. > Errr, that's what my patch did deal with, though? Unless there's another > web server policy somewhere? My mistake. -- see shy jo
