Your message was From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...?
On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:02:17AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Do you mean accessing docs programatically (rare) or by reference in man > pages and error messages (sorta common)? Programmatically, mainly. > If the latter, it seems a bit > late to ask for a thurough audit of all of debian's man pages and error > messages and so on before the freeze[1]. It's only changing a "should". And we ought to be able to do the audit fairly quickly: it just means doing a fair chunk of grepping. > It also has the problem of the web server policy still requiring that > "HTML documents for a package are stored in `/usr/share/doc/<package>' > but should be accessed via symlinks as `/usr/doc/<package>'" (So at the > minimum, your policy patch needs to deal with that, too.) Errr, that's what my patch did deal with, though? Unless there's another web server policy somewhere? > I thought the idea was to freeze policy soon in preparation for freezing > Debian? The idea is to get policy to describe what we want to release, yes. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgp0Btga2rr1r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
