On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: <snip> >when I rewrite lintian (started yesterday) the lintian messages will match >policy: > >Error (E:) -- violate a MUST >Warning (W:) -- violate a SHOULD >XXXXXXX (?:) -- a MAY is not followed
Advisory (A:)? >not sure what I am naming the MAY message. Messages that are not due to policy >violations will have their level set on the importance of the problem. > >With this restructuring, a Developer who gets a third level may ignore the >message, ignore a Warning for a short time and know that E: means 'I should >read policy'. > > >-- >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- I can be immature if I want to, because I'm mature enough to make my own decisions. Who is John Galt? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
