On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 01:31:30AM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: > Reading the rest of the thread, I sense there's a consnsensus that it'd be > ok to file such bugs if they weren't rc, at least. So 578 priority > normal bugs coming right up unless someone tells me otherwise.
I'm sure you've got a better idea than I do where lintian's up to at the moment, but, if it's possible, it'd probably be helpful to also include all the lintian errors in a package (or at least an "interesting" subset thereof), and making it `serious' iff some of those errors are against MUST clauses... Or not. Whatever. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgpShj30Ht9bc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
