Hi Marcelo,
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> > I don't quite get your point here...
>
> "better" isn't an order relation for the { native, non-native } set.
Ooops, sorry, if I said "better", I meant "better suited for the
particular case".
> It would be *nice* if debian/changelog listed *only* packaging changes.
> It makes easier for other people to figure out if there was a packaging
> mistake form one release to the next and makes it easier to fix
> packaging mistakes without having to wait for a new upstream release
> (or without forcing one). If this is a problem (i.e, means more work),
> I guess ChangeLog is being generated from CVS log entries, which is in
> general terms a good thing.
No, the CVS log would generate much too much noise in our ChangeLog, so
it's hand-maintained.
IMHO, waiting for new upstream releases is not an issue yet, as there's
literally always something to release...
> PS: Fix your MTA. I see 'From: Siggi Langauf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
There's nothing to fix. That's where the mail comes from. If I wanted
replies to another address, I'd specify a Reply-to:.
(Or do you _only_ see <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ? Then you must be at uni and
it's not my MTA, but mailgw.informatik who shortened the address ;-)
Regards,
Siggi
