>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> We can, and do, distribute individual .debs. We advertise in various
Thomas> ways individual .debs. It is true that we only *support* their use on
Thomas> Debian systems, which can be relied on to have GPL copies. But the
Thomas> GPL doesn't say "you must give the recipient a copy of this License if
Thomas> you are supporting their use of the software" It says "if you give
Thomas> them the sw, you must give them the License".
But that is not the only thing we distribute. The users have
ample opportunity to get the GPL, either in a required, essential
package, or with the sources, with the official CD, a mirror of our
archive, and via email from any of a few hundred Debian developers.
When we give them the software, we do give them the GPL. When
they take a small part of our software, and ignore what we say is the
full, supported set, well, hell, even the FSF does not follow that
rule.
manoj
--
What do you call frogs sauteed in egg and milk? Fried toads. --
Lani Anderson
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
