On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 12:55:39PM -0700, Rando Christensen wrote: > That way, even dpkg would warn on a --install that license-gpl was > suppossed to be installed as well, which counts, IMO, as accompanying all > gpl'd programs with the GPL itself.
Note that dpkg itself is GPLed, so if you have a working version of dpkg, you almost certainly already have a copy of the GPL. (On a Debian system, the GPL's in base-files, which is essential). Note that if you want to get any use out of a deb (other than just look at how it's laid out, maybe), you almost certainly need to run it on a Linux system, and Linux is also GPLed (ditto Hurd). Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Thanks to all avid pokers out there'' -- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
pgplLstseemKR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
