Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Seth Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > * Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001205 20:37]: > > > Fortunately, things aren't very severe right now. And, certainly, > > > I think that if we could pull a solution together by the time that > > > Woody freezes, that would indicate good faith. > > > > It might not hurt to wait for RMS to get back to us wrt what his lawyer > > said. > > We must not linger indefinitely, but it's also appropriate to wait and > see. I had a little email conversation with rms once this thread > appeared, and there are several points and observations that poeple > pointed out here which I conveyed to him, and it seems to me he's > mulling over and thinking. I'm sure we can rely on him to say > something once that process is over, until then, further arguing here > is not likely to be productive unless someone has a substantially new > observation to make.
Any news from RMS yet?
