Your message dated Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in debian-policy 3.2.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 1999 00:52:19 +0000
Received: (qmail 21668 invoked from network); 31 Dec 1999 00:52:18 -0000
Received: from apocalypse.debian.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Dec 1999 00:52:18 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by apocalypse.debian.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id TAA02390
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:52:16 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:52:16 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSED] revision of the Motif/LessTif policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
Severity: wishlist
Semantic revisions.
--
G. Branden Robinson | There's nothing an agnostic can't do
Debian GNU/Linux | if he doesn't know whether he believes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | in it or not.
roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | -- Graham Chapman
--- policy.sgml.orig Wed Dec 29 17:01:51 1999
+++ policy.sgml Wed Dec 29 18:02:39 1999
@@ -3175,33 +3175,25 @@
System packages install their files into a different
directory in the future.</p>
- <p>
- If you package a program that requires the (non-free)
- OSF/Motif library, you should try to determine whether the
- programs works reasonably well with the free
- re-implementation of Motif called LessTif. If so, build the
- package using the LessTif libraries; it can then go into the
- main section of the package repository and become an
- official part of the Debian distribution.</p>
-
<p>
- If however, the Motif-based program works insufficiently
- well with LessTif, you should instead provide "-smotif" and "-dmotif"
- versions (appending these identifiers to the name of the
- package), which are statically and dynamically linked
- against the Motif libraries, respectively. (All known
- versions of OSF/Motif permit redistribution of
- statically-linked binaries using the library, but check the
- license on your copy of Motif to be sure.) This two-package
- approach allows users without Motif to use the package,
- whereas users with Motif installed can enjoy the advantages
- of the dynamically-linked version (a considerable savings in
- disk space usage, download time, etc.). Neither "-smotif"
- nor "-dmotif" packages can go into the main section; if the
- licensing on the package is compatible with the Debian Free
- Software Guidelines, it may go into the contrib section;
- otherwise it must go into the non-free section.
-
+ <em>Programs that require the non-DFSG-compliant OSF/Motif
+ library</em> should be compiled against and tested with LessTif
+ (a free re-implementation of Motif) instead. If the maintainer
+ judges that the program or programs do not work sufficiently well
+ with LessTif to be distributed and supported, but do so when
+ compiled against Motif, then two versions of the package should
+ be created; one linked statically against Motif and with
+ <tt>-smotif</tt> appended to the package name, and one linked
+ dynamically against Motif and with <tt>-dmotif</tt> appended to
+ the package name. Both Motif-linked versions are dependent upon
+ non-DFSG-compliant software and thus cannot be uploaded to the
+ main distribution; if the software is itself DFSG-compliant it
+ may be uploaded to the contrib distribution. While known
+ existing versions of OSF/Motif permit unlimited redistribution of
+ binaries linked against the library (whether statically or
+ dynamically), it is the package maintainer's responsibility to
+ determine whether this is permitted by the license of the copy of
+ OSF/Motif in his or her possession.
</p>
</sect>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 53761-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2000 22:17:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 02 17:17:22 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.interchange.ubc.ca [137.82.27.15]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
id 13K6pG-0004dX-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 17:17:22 -0500
Received: from srtp05-245.resnet.ubc.ca ([142.103.56.245] helo=polya)
by mail.interchange.ubc.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1)
id 13K6pH-0003m6-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:17:23 -0700
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13K6pA-0007wU-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed in debian-policy 3.2.0.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
These bugs have been closed in policy version 3.2.0.0.
Thanks Manoj!
Julian
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/
