Your message dated Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Closed in debian-policy 3.2.0.0
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Dec 1999 00:51:51 +0000
Received: (qmail 21652 invoked from network); 31 Dec 1999 00:51:50 -0000
Received: from apocalypse.debian.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
  by master.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Dec 1999 00:51:50 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by apocalypse.debian.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-6) id TAA02380
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:51:48 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:51:47 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PROPOSED] revision of X application-defaults policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i

Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.1.1.1
Severity: wishlist

Mostly a semantic revision, but also clarifies the language to properly
address the package maintainer, not the system administrator, as to how to
manage /etc/X11/Xresources.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson            |         Yesterday upon the stair,
Debian GNU/Linux               |         I met a man who wasn't there.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         |         He wasn't there again today,
roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |         I think he's from the CIA.

--- policy.sgml.orig    Wed Dec 29 17:01:51 1999
+++ policy.sgml Wed Dec 29 17:24:15 1999
@@ -3140,21 +3140,20 @@
          without) of your package.</p>
          
        <p>
-         <em>Application defaults</em> files have to be installed in
-         the directory <tt>/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults/</tt>.
-         They are considered as part of the program code.  Thus, they
-         should not be modified and should not be tagged as
-         <em>conffile</em>s nor otherwise treated as configuration
-         files.  If the local system administrator wants
-         to customize X applications globally, a file with the same
-         name as that of the package should be placed in the
-         <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources/</tt> directory instead.
+         <em>Application defaults</em> files must be installed in the
+         directory <tt>/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/app-defaults/</tt>.  They should
+         not be registered as <em>conffile</em>s or otherwise treated as
+         configuration files.  Customization of programs' X resources may
+         be supported with the provision of a file with the same name as
+         that of the package placed in the <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources/</tt>
+         directory, which should be registered as a <em>conffile</em>.
          <em>Important:</em> packages that install files into the
-         <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources/</tt> directory <em>must</em>
-         declare a conflict with <tt>xbase (&lt;&lt;
-         3.3.2.3a-2)</tt>; if this is not done it is possible for the
-         package to destroy a previously-existing
-         <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources</tt> <em>file</em>.</p>
+         <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources/</tt> directory <em>must</em> declare a
+         conflict with <tt>xbase (&lt;&lt; 3.3.2.3a-2)</tt>; if this is
+         not done it is possible for the installing package to destroy a
+         previously-existing <tt>/etc/X11/Xresources</tt> <em>file</em>
+         which had been customized by the system administrator.</p>
+       </p>
          
        <p>
          No package should ever install files into the directories
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 53760-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Aug 2000 22:17:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 02 17:17:22 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.interchange.ubc.ca [137.82.27.15] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
        id 13K6pG-0004dX-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 17:17:22 -0500
Received: from srtp05-245.resnet.ubc.ca ([142.103.56.245] helo=polya)
        by mail.interchange.ubc.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1)
        id 13K6pH-0003m6-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:17:23 -0700
Received: from jdg by polya with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
        id 13K6pA-0007wU-00; Wed, 02 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 15:17:16 -0700
From: Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Closed in debian-policy 3.2.0.0
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

These bugs have been closed in policy version 3.2.0.0.

Thanks Manoj!

   Julian

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

  Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, QMW, Univ. of London. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Debian GNU/Linux Developer,  see http://www.debian.org/~jdg
  Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/

Reply via email to