On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 07:38:09PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > It would not be better. I had to add the Conflict line because otherwise > > you would install efingerd over (e.g.) cfinger, and either it would > > remove cfinger from /etc/inetd.conf, and when you removed cfinger it > > happily deleted efingerd entry, or it could leave cfinger entry alone, and > > you have to modify it manually - not good. > > That just means efingerd's postinst is broken.
no, it's cfingerd that it broken - it happily removes entries, not noticing if they were made by cfingerd or anything else (at least did when I was packaging efingerd, a long time ago) Or is this preferrable behaviour? -- ----------------------------------------------------------- | Radovan Garabik http://melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk/~garabik/ | | __..--^^^--..__ garabik @ melkor.dnp.fmph.uniba.sk | ----------------------------------------------------------- Antivirus alert: file .signature infected by signature virus. Hi! I'm a signature virus! Copy me into your signature file to help me spread!
