On 29 Jan 2000 at 15:23, Brian May wrote about "Re: Custom undocumented(7)s...":
> I disagree. Take Heimdal for instance. It is a very complicated > package (at least by my standards), has numerous libraries and > clients. Most of the binaries are obvious, eg telnet, ftp, and even > come with man pages. However, some don't, eg, des, verify_krb5_conf, > string2key. One alternative (and I am by no means stating that this is acceptable for all packages) might be to break up the package into numerous, smaller packages. With some packages it isn't, technically, possile. Just a thought. > willing to accept patches ;-) ). I think there are more important bugs > in Heimdal (it still under active development) then fixing man pages. Agreed. -- Brock Rozen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
