On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 01:43:03PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > > This is patently absurd: there is no need to have *three* locations of > pixmaps and three for bitmaps on our systems, in addition to a
I agree. > (1) All pixmaps and bitmaps live in /usr/share/icons. End of story. > *NO* pixmaps or bitmaps will live in /usr/X11R6/include. This one gets my vote. I think it's a good idea in general, and it'll be trivial for me to alter my packages to suit, so I'm not too fussed about what direction is taken. However, my package uses /usr/share/pixmaps, for a bunch of pixmaps, which I think gives a much better description of what is actually _in_ that directory, as opposed to /usr/share/icons. I don't have icons, I have pixmaps. daniel
