On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 01:43:03PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > PixmapPath /usr/local/share/icons:/usr/share/icons:/usr/share/pixmaps:\ > /usr/include/X11/pixmaps > IconPath /usr/local/share/icons:/usr/share/icons:/usr/include/X11/bitmaps:\ > /usr/X11R6/include/bitmaps > > This is patently absurd: there is no need to have *three* locations of > pixmaps and three for bitmaps on our systems, in addition to a > location for locally installed icons. I want to standardise the > location (it is not discussed by the FHS).
Good idea. > (1) All pixmaps and bitmaps live in /usr/share/icons. End of story. > *NO* pixmaps or bitmaps will live in /usr/X11R6/include. [...] > Either way, I want to do away with /usr/X11R6/include/bitmaps, which > is simply wrong, and /usr/share/pixmaps, which is unnecessary. "yea". I'll second this kind of proposal. -- enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
