On Sun, Sep 19, 1999 at 10:32:59AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Sep 19, Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I think the practice of using static IDs should be deprecated (and > >packages doing it should get lintian warnings..) I disagree with banning > Please provide a rationale. Some of my packages need a static ID (64000 > is assigned, the only one assigned so far) because their spool could > need to be NFS shared.
And my home directory could be NFS stored---does that mean that uid/gid 1000 should always and forever belong to knghtbrd on every system? It's up to the sysadmin of a given system to make sure this is done the way they wish it to be done. -- Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian GNU/Linux developer GnuPG: 2048g/3F9C2A43 - 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3 PGP 2.6: 2048R/50BDA0ED - E8 D6 84 81 E3 A8 BB 77 8E E2 29 96 C9 44 5F BE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- <dark> Knghtbrd: We have lots of whatevers. <Knghtbrd> dark - In Debian? Hell yeah we do!
pgpxEaZbHrM2j.pgp
Description: PGP signature
