In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >My understanding was that static IDs were for packages that did include the >code to support dynamic IDs. There is no really reason at all for a package to >have a static ID.
Wrong! Lets demonstrate by counter example: [511] [snoopy:bam] ~ >ls -ld /usr/bin/*(^g:root:) -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 403776 Oct 16 1998 /usr/bin/elm* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root news 36068 Sep 7 08:21 /usr/bin/inews* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 10108 Apr 8 21:59 /usr/bin/lockfile* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 63564 Jul 1 1998 /usr/bin/mail* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root uucp 166252 Nov 7 1998 /usr/bin/minicom* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 6652 Feb 28 1999 /usr/bin/mutt_dotlock* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root mail 1191788 Aug 11 1998 /usr/bin/pine* -rwsr-sr-x 1 root mail 59900 Apr 8 21:59 /usr/bin/procmail* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root news 18308 Sep 7 08:20 /usr/bin/rnews* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 9996 Dec 12 1998 /usr/bin/wall* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root tty 9416 Dec 12 1998 /usr/bin/write* [512] [snoopy:bam] ~ >ls -ld /usr/bin/*(^u:root:) -rwsr-xr-x 1 man root 76832 Jun 9 22:38 /usr/bin/man* -rwsr-xr-x 1 man root 62300 Jun 9 22:38 /usr/bin/mandb* [504] [snoopy:bam] ~ >ls -ld /usr/sbin/*(^u:root:) -rwsr-sr-- 1 irc root 224908 Oct 17 1998 /usr/sbin/ircd* -r-xr-sr-x 1 postfix postdrop 48244 Jul 1 13:45 /usr/sbin/postdrop* [505] [snoopy:bam] ~ >ls -ld /usr/sbin/*(^g:root:) -rwsr-xr-- 1 root news 7992 Sep 7 08:20 /usr/sbin/inndstart* -rwxr-sr-x 1 root kmem 82436 Jul 17 1998 /usr/sbin/lsof* -r-xr-sr-x 1 postfix postdrop 48244 Jul 1 13:45 /usr/sbin/postdrop* -rwsr-xr-- 1 root dip 105884 Jun 19 1998 /usr/sbin/pppd* (there maybe more instances of this occuring, I have just scratched the surface.) Yet, /usr, according to the filesystem standard is meant to be sharable among different systems. If these IDs aren't statically allocated, you might find that the above SUID and SGID programs are SUID and SGID to the *wrong* uid or gid!!! Is it really worth it? Anyway, this is something to watch out for. Somebody else suggested that other files (queue files? I can't check until I send this) may need to be shared, too, but I can't confirm/deny this. -- Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpgF7v44YPOM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
