Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >Please provide a rationale. Some of my packages need a static ID (64000 > >is assigned, the only one assigned so far) because their spool could > >need to be NFS shared. > > As the maintainer of diskless, I am curious: > > What packages need a ID that could be shared over NFS? ie what > packages *need* a static ID?
My understanding was that static IDs were for packages that did include the code to support dynamic IDs. There is no really reason at all for a package to have a static ID. -- I consume, therefore I am
