On Sat, Aug 28, 1999 at 12:50:57PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > That would be awful. Having to wait while something is rubberstamped, > just to get around an issue of protocol -- that just adds a useless > layer to something that is already ponderous. This is a volunteer > project, not a phone company!
Erm, by "rubber stamp", I probably mean "delegate". "Have no further involvement" was the intention. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred. ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.'' -- Linus Torvalds
pgpQJkdBysfID.pgp
Description: PGP signature
