Hi,
>>"Raul" == Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Raul> (*) Policy is *supposed* to be a formulation of existing practice.
Raul> If everybody agrees, the technical committee doesn't need to get
Raul> involved.
How can evolutionalry changes be then ratified into policy? I
understand about new policy issues, you get a bunch of packages to do
things, and then make that practice policy. (This has pros and cons)
If this statement is interpreted strictly, then once set,
policy is indeed writ in stone (doing things different from the
policy document can't be existing practice unless people blatantly
violate policy, and then we make policy whatever thoise people are
doing).
I am beginning to feel we are straying too far into
bureaucratic realm here, but may be I just don't get the issues
involved.
manoj
--
A man forgives only when he is in the wrong.
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
