On Aug 26, Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> But only fcntl() locking is not enough, because Linux 2.0.* doesn't >> support this over NFS and then we have no locking over NFS. > >And linux 2.2.x with a userland server also does not support fcntl >locking, it generates an annoying kernel message and fails with ENOLCK. Fine, then users should not read mail from 2.2 servers with user space nfsd, because it is not reliable.
-- ciao, Marco
