Manoj Srivastava wrote: > b) Formally seconded, and a time > table set for discussion (normally normal bug, titled [AMENDMENT > yy/mm/dd] > 10 days to a month)
How many seconds should this require? 1 or 2? > Should we keep the rejected proposals around in the BTS in > state fixed, so that one does not have to redo the old arguments over > again? Well it's all mostly archived in the list archives too, if someone brings up an old issue it can be found there. -- see shy jo
