Hi,
You are correct in all points. However, this is not quie set
in stone. I think I mayu have sdome changes to offer, more in a
following message.
>>"Julian" == Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Julian> I'm not sure I fully understand this. Can I try repeating it
Julian> and you say if I am correct? I'm also not quite sure how
Julian> your categories and Joey's (amendments, consensus, active
Julian> proposals and stalled proposals) match up.
Julian> Original pre-formal discussion period:
Julian> Subject: [PROPOSAL] blah blah
Julian> Severity: wishlist
Julian> Start of formal discussion period, when proposal is put forward as an
Julian> amendment:
Julian> Subject: [AMENDMENT DD/MM/YYYY] blah blah
Julian> Severity: normal
Julian> If and when a formal proposal is accepted, so that the proposed
Julian> amendment is now waiting to be implemented into policy (as listed in
Julian> Joey's weekly mailing as amendments or consensus?):
If there is a consensus, the amendment goes on to the next
stage. If there _is_ no consenstus, or the proposal is stalled at
this point, the proposal should be marked rejected, and the
Julian> Subject: [AMENDMENT DD/MM/YYYY] blah blah
Julian> Severity: normal
Julian> Marked as forwarded
Julian> When the accepted proposal is actually implemented into
Julian> Policy, the -policy group will retitle bug as [ACCEPTED] and
Julian> close the bug report.
manoj
--
I took a course in speed reading and was able to read War and Peace
in twenty minutes. It's about Russia. Woody Allen
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
