> > ``The freedom to use the best features of the program, while > boycotting all non-free software. (freedom 4)'' > > [1] ACCEPT freedom to boycott, and change the DFSG accordingly > [2] ACCEPT freedom to boycott, but only change the definition of `main' > [3] ACCEPT freedom to boycott, but only create a `pure' subset of `main' > [ ] REJECT freedom to boycott, and maintain the status quo > [ ] REJECT freedom to boycott, and ban all future discussion > [4] FURTHER DISCUSSION >
So is Debian to choose what to boycott? or the user? As seen by this discussion, people's view on 'free' is varied. It seems that people will have a problem with us making the decision for them. Debian is already marked by many as being a wee off. While I agree w/ Branden, James, et. al. on this issue, it is becoming apparent that a black and white decision here will cause more harm than good.
