On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Santiago Vila wrote: > Ok. To make it fully clear, I hereby change my earlier proposal to > this one: > > extra > > "This contains all packages that conflict with others with required, > important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be > useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements." > > > The difference with respect to the previous proposal is merely the > addition of the "all" word, as suggested by Stephen Zander, so that it is > clearly understood that whenever a package fits this description, it has > to be of extra priority. > > > [ Mmm, do I need seconds again? ]
You probably do. In any case, I second this new propsal. Jules /----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\ | Jelibean aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6 Evelyn Rd | | Jules aka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Richmond, Surrey | | Julian Bean | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TW9 2TF *UK* | +----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+ | War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. | | When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. | \----------------------------------------------------------------------/
