Ok. To make it fully clear, I hereby change my earlier proposal to this one:
extra "This contains all packages that conflict with others with required, important, standard or optional priorities, or are only likely to be useful if you already know what they are or have specialised requirements." The difference with respect to the previous proposal is merely the addition of the "all" word, as suggested by Stephen Zander, so that it is clearly understood that whenever a package fits this description, it has to be of extra priority. [ Mmm, do I need seconds again? ] Thanks. -- "e2d7f2692904f9118e32bceae143aa90" (a truly random sig)
