> I view both of these as developers failing to live up to the responsibility > that they accepted when they accepted maintainorship of packages. The > second example is particularly bad; the developer could at least reply to > the person submitting a bug. > > In light if this, I ask if we have some mechanism for either removing a
Not removing ... could we set these developers to an status 'hold' or a similary one? > developer from Debian if they have serious lack of responsibility issues, or > at least of declaring their packages orphaned and up for adoption. If not, If the developer is on 'hold' all his packages should then be freed for adoption. MfG, Hartmut
