[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 17, 1998 at 10:34:41PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > Most of the remainder had GPL licenses. But I was shocked to find that > > most had *only* GPL licenses. If that was really the case, then these > > should go in main. > > No. There are several reasons why a GPL-ed package may not meet the criteria > for main.
That probably means we're not allowed to distribute them at all. That's what the GPL says. > [kde*] > > lyx_0.12.0.final-0.1.deb > > ddd-dmotif_2.2.3-2.deb > > Depends on a non-free library (-> cannot be built with packages in main). Depends on a non-free library <-> cannot be distributed under the terms of the GPL. > > ddd-smotif_2.2.3-2.deb > > Cannot be built with packages in main. Requires non-free software <-> cannot be distributed under the terms of the GPL. > [gstep-*] > > Needs a newer ghostscript than the free one in main. GS 4 has been freed, > but that was too late to get it into main. That's ok then. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
