Hi Guilhem, one last more thing.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dropbear/2014.65-1ubuntu1
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dropbear/2014.65-1ubuntu2
how do you feel about merging the two above Ubuntu deltas in the Debian
packaging?
I'm going to sponsor soon, it has been a few days and nobody complained yet,
and I'm
not sure what else to check here.
cheers,
G.
Il Sabato 3 Ottobre 2015 21:12, Guilhem Moulin <guil...@guilhem.org> ha scritto:
Hi!
On Fri, 02 Oct 2015 at 15:49:18 +0000, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> no problem, just ping me whenever your package becomes ready again.
So with Guillem Jover's help on #debian-dpkg I managed to solve the
problem of the configuration file in dropbear 2014.65-1's /usr. (Using
dpkg-maintscript-helper to move it to /etc upon upgrade.) As a
consequence the source package is now lintian-clean and upgrades
smoothly from Jessie :-)
Moreover, piuparts is now happy \o/ (Ignoring the broken symlink
warnings.) Interestingly, piuparts complains when given the .changes
file; but giving the .deb by order of dependence makes it happy (I guess
one ought to file a bug against dpkg or piuparts):
sudo piuparts --schroot=unstable-amd64-sbuild … \
dropbear_2015.68-1_all.deb \
dropbear-bin_2015.68-1_amd64.deb \
dropbear-run_2015.68-1_amd64.deb \
dropbear-initramfs_2015.68-1_amd64.deb
I therefore changed the distribution from experimental back to unstable,
and uploaded a new version:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dropbear/dropbear_2015.68-1.dsc
Cheers,
--
Guilhem.
