-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi,
On 15/09/15 22:50, Vincent Blut wrote: > Le mar. 15 sept. 2015 à 22:33, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> a écrit : >> On 15-09-15 22:06, Paul Gevers wrote: >>> On 15-09-15 21:56, Vincent Blut wrote: >>>> Could you please take a look at chrony 1.31.1-2¹? >>> >>> Sure, my dashboard told me that there was a new chrony, so I was >>> expecting this e-mail. Surprisingly it was not to package that. Could >>> you also fix the watch file, as you seem to be not following the 2.x >>> branch? >> >> And I may have asked before, why aren't you? Looking at the version >> numbers and their timing, you are just lagging, not really following an >> other branch are you? What is the plan? So if you want to switch to 2.x, >> you don't need to update the watch file, and I can upload as is (after >> checking). > > Well, I didn’t start packaging the 2.x upstream release, because I wanted to > smoothly upgrade chrony in Debian to catch regressions more easily, but don’t > worry, 2.0 (and 2.1.1 soon after) is in the pipe. The changes from 1.3x and > 2.x > are quite huge (NTP v4 support, etc.), so it will take some times to be in > good > shape, but I’m currently working on this and hope to send you some stuff to > review > in october. > You may want to put the 2 branch in experiemental to begin with. Jerome -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV+IasAAoJEIC/w4IMSybjFBwIAIumA/5ykTkNN7iHHZTzFYHX sJFH3dH0hud+BJ+WrlThT45Gw78DSbHBcEDrfg+1DkdT33CjloBI/BaIL2yY/kx3 W5tqOoWzIlBweL4pcHAxFxnDRAUN0/IQisW9xUfZlDVuKLch3iXOhbI5GY7Hs38q lq4i3fWG3oRRMDdpSe81tMM3rZ4bKUNeQDOKqyqyPUNHmNlv3oRs97K+ELJznDnf TLSa2HzvUGnu9Ft/9YcFVwE+DhoW0qyqnBh0+RoIs/g5+/HbsT2F8bJ8E7H8Gb/l TKhHyLNzV5SB3tKtTORkhBHvodcN54KDFCvvlG5F2D5Z4SQKDjmw0eWj7M53VSo= =TvA2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
